Quantcast
Channel: TV Licensing
Viewing all 1019 articles
Browse latest View live

Beating TV Licensing: Actions Speak Louder than Words

$
0
0
Our good friend TheJesusofKayaking - the BBC's most favourite kayaking, lasagne and barbel enthusiast in the whole wide world - has produced another fine specimen for the YouTube keep net.


 
His latest video illustrates one of the most effective and foolproof strategies yet for dealing with TV Licensing goon visits: doing nothing at all.

No-one is under any legal obligation at all to assist TV Licensing, so why bother? Doing so is often a total waste of time anyway, as many of our readers would testify.

By doing nothing at all the occupier deprives TV Licensing of its most valuable asset: information. Without information TV Licensing is powerless. TV Licensing needs information about the licensable status of a property to escalate its enquiries. Without information TV Licensing gets nowhere.

As he says, what could be easier than doing nothing at all? Apart from doing nothing at all with your feet up and a can of Stella in hand!

Of course we still encourage filming of TV Licensing goon visits for anyone wanting to tackle them face to face.

For further strategies against TV Licensing please download our free ebook, TV Licensing Laid Bare.

TV Licensing Hounds Bereaved Family Despite Being Told About Death of Licence Holder

$
0
0

TV Licensing has callously hounded a grieving son for the payment of his late father's TV licence fee.

Mike Groom, from Stockton-on-Tees, wrote to the TV Licensing Blog and explained how his father had sadly passed away at the start of October last year. The TV licence for the property was in his father's name and a few weeks later, when Mike's mother moved into a residential care home, there was no longer anyone there to receive TV programmes.

It fell to Mike to make contact with TV Licensing and explain the circumstances. Mike informed TV Licensing that he wished to cancel the TV licence for the property, which he actually owns. He also spoke to the bank and arranged for the monthly Direct Debit payments to be stopped.

A few weeks later Mike received the first of several telephone calls from TV Licensing asking for his father by name. It appears TV Licensing had kept a record of Mike's mobile number from his earlier contact with them. They had associated his mobile number with the account of his father, and had made contact to find out why the Direct Debit had been cancelled and demand he make up the "missed" payments. That tactless call, remember, came despite Mike having previously contacted TV Licensing to explain the situation.

Speaking to the TV Licensing Blog, Mike described his distress at heartless manner of TV Licensing's enquiries: "I was very upset and made that very clear, but still got calls increasingly indignant - they continued to aggressively pursue the amount even faced with the knowledge they had just called and asked a son for his recently passed father."

When TV Licensing did eventually take notice of what Mike was telling them, they demanded written confirmation that a TV licence was no longer required at the property.

Mike continued: "I objected, having already gone out of my way to call them. I said I didn't see why they had to have a letter, since it was easy to check the facts without further upsetting me.

"This went on ad nauseum, one department having seen this letter and another denying it existed.

"The way TV Licensing chased this was not delicate or dignified and was distressing to me during a difficult time in my life - they shouldn't get away with it."

As if TV Licensing harassing a family in mourning wasn't bad enough, it later transpired that Mike's father was actually in credit with his TV licence payments.

We offer our condolences to Mike and his family at this difficult time. We condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the cold-hearted and incompetent manner in which TV Licensing has handled his situation.

Stories like Mike's are sadly quite common. Every week we hear how TV Licensing has attempted to bully payment from some of the most vulnerable people in society when they actually owe nothing at all. Worse still, TV Licensing is often made aware that nothing is owed, yet persists in issuing threats regardless.

TV Licensing's behaviour, which is fully endorsed and condoned by the BBC, is reprehensible. In 21st century Britain it is obscene that an organisation can terrorise people in their own homes on the basis of ZERO evidence of wrongdoing. That's exactly what TV Licensing does on a daily basis.

Enough is enough. It's time to press the standby button on TV Licensing for the final time.

Anyone who has experienced similar treatment by TV Licensing is asked to please contact us via the email address on the sidebar.

TV Licence: Have Internet, But No TV

$
0
0

An increasing number of people are abandoning conventional TV in favour of the internet, but where do they stand in terms of TV licence law?

Recent Ofcom research indicates that today's teenagers are more tech savvy than ever, with the next generation of licence-fee-payers spending less than half their viewing time watching licensable live broadcast TV programmes. 

An increasing number of younger viewers are turning to DVDs, online catch-up services and downloadable programmes, none of which require payment of the £145.50 a year TV licence fee. Furthermore, only 3% of the 16 to 24-year-olds surveyed said they would miss watching live broadcast TV programmes, compared to almost a third of those aged 65 and over.

It appears people's viewing habits are shifting dramatically with the evolution of new technology, but TV licence legislation remains pretty much as it was first drafted in the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949.

Current legislation, section 363 of the Communications Act 2003, states that a TV receiver must not be installed or used unless the property is covered by a valid TV licence. 

A TV receiver, within the meaning of the Act, is any apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any TV programme service, whether or not it is installed or used for any other purpose. Quite simply, if it's not installed or used for receiving TV programmes, then it's not a TV receiver and does not need to be covered by a TV licence.

Although TV programmes are freely available only a few mouse across the web, a computer (tablet or mobile phone) is not a TV receiver unless actually used for the purpose of receiving TV programmes. That will only be the case if the person using the device actually navigates to a web page displaying TV programmes.

Mere ownership of a computer (tablet or mobile phone), or access to the web, does not therefore require a TV licence unless that device is actually used for the purposes of receiving TV programmes.

Similarly, mere ownership of a TV set does not require a TV licence, unless that set is used for the purposes of receiving TV programmes.

We'd also remind readers of the following important points:
  • In some limited circumstances a person will already be covered to view TV programmes in a property other than their normal home address. This rule is particularly useful for students.
  • The viewing of non-live catch-up services does not require a TV licence, as these fall outside the legal definition of a TV programme service.
  • The occupier of a correctly unlicensed property is under no legal obligation whatsoever to communicate or co-operate with TV Licensing and we strongly recommend they don't.
  • The occupier of a correctly unlicensed property is under no legal obligation to confirm the licensable status of their property to TV Licensing.
  • TV Licensing goons work for a private company contracted to do the BBC's dirty work. They have no more legal rights or authority than any other visitor to a property.
For further information please download our free ebook, TV Licensing Laid Bare.

If you've found this article useful please point your friends in our direction.

BBC Newcastle: RAJAR Drinks Are On Us

$
0
0
BBC Newcastle

BBC Newcastle staff were each rewarded with a £50 voucher and drinks on the licence fee payer, after the station achieved bumper listening figures.

The station, which boasts broadcasting legends like Alfie Joey, Charlie Charlton and Sue Sweeney, comes from premises nicknamed the 'Pink Palace' on the city's Barrack Road. It achieved a reach of 370,000 in the last quarter of 2013, according to figures published by RAJAR.

The story has just come to light after the BBC responded to a recent Freedom of Information request by Carl Jefferson.

A BBC spokesperson said: "BBC Newcastle achieved record listening figures in the last quarter of 2013.

"As common in many organisations, it was decided to hold a small informal get together to thank the station’s hardworking staff for their contribution towards this success, and strict rules and policies keep costs low."

In a previous request Carl established that the BBC spent more than £3,000 on what it grandiosely describes as a "Synergy Wall" within the Pink Palace. The wall, which is hidden from normal public view, includes photographs of various BBC Newcastle personalities and was knocked together by some local university students.

It would appear that Carl has some insider knowledge of how the BBC operates in Newcastle and we'd very much like him to get in touch.

MP Calls For Action Over TV Licensing Threatograms

$
0
0

The Labour MP for North Ayrshire and Arran has called for action against the way TV Licensing terrorises innocent individuals by sending them threatening reminder letters.

A TV licence is only required by those properties where equipment is used or installed to receive TV programmes at the same time as they are broadcast to other members of the public.

Katy Clark tabled a parliamentary question on the subject following complaints from non-viewing constituents about the way TV Licensing continued to send them threatening letters, despite being informed about their no-TV status.

TV Licensing sends an average of 100,000 of the intimidating letters every day, despite the BBC acknowledging that at least 80% of the recipients have no legal need for a TV licence.

Speaking about the subject on her website, Katy said: "I appreciate that those responsible for TV Licensing do an important job and it goes without saying that all those who require a TV License should purchase one. I am however concerned that at present the language which is used in letters sent by TV Licensing to households without televisions can be inappropriate.

"Often those who do not have a TV Licence are either elderly or vulnerable people for whom receiving a letter threatening legal action can be a distressing experience. There should be a simple way for households without televisions to register that fact with TV Licensing and then should any further correspondence be necessary it can be conducted in a much more considerate tone than at present."

Ed Vaizey MP, the Liberal Democrat Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, provided the following response to Katy's question: "TV Licensing is responsible for all operational decisions regarding enforcement of the licence fee, including correspondence. Any changes to the enforcement regime, including outcomes from the TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review, would need to be considered as a part of the review of the BBC's Royal Charter."

TV Licensing Warning to Six Nations Rugby Fans

$
0
0
TV Licensing Six Nations Rugby

TV Licensing has issued a warning to Six Nations Rugby fans who might be tempted to tune into the tournament without a valid TV licence.

According to a press release on the TV Licensing website, its goons will be visiting unlicensed pubs, clubs and bars throughout this year's tournament, which kicks off next weekend and lasts until 21st March 2015.

A TV licence is required for any property where equipment is used or installed to receive TV programmes at the time they are shown. Businesses choosing to show TV programmes to customers require a TV licence covering the public area of the premises. Additionally, a second TV licence might be required to cover the reception of TV programmes in private or residential parts of the premises.

Neil Robertson, of trade body the British Institute of Innkeeping, said: "We know that pub landlords are always keen to stay within the law so if you’re showing the RBS 6 Nations, it’s a good opportunity to make sure you’re correctly covered by a TV Licence. Pub managers and landlords with residential accommodation on the premises also need to check that they are correctly covered in those separate areas too."

Remember that a TV licence is only needed if equipment is used to receive TV programmes at the same time as they are broadcast. There are many ways you can enjoy the Six Nations perfectly legally without a TV licence. Here are just a few:

1. Watch it non-live on a catch up service: You do not need a licence to enjoy previously broadcast non-live coverage on the BBC's iPlayer for example.

2. Watch live at a friend's place: If they've got a TV licence you could go and watch their telly instead. If you didn't want to impose you could take your laptop around and stream live TV via their broadband connection.

3. Watch live at the pub/club: I'm reliably informed by student friends that you can nurture a soft drink for at least two hours if you sip it slowly. That's just enough time to watch the game.

4. Watch live at your local electrical retailer: Electrical retailers do not need a TV licence for their display sets. If you're a bit of a cheapskate you could visit Currys and watch the best events there.

5. Become a TV engineer: If you're a TV fixer upper then you do not need a TV licence to test equipment you're working on.

We don't condone anyone taking a chance by watching the Six Nations without a valid TV licence. That said, we're so not bothered if anyone chooses to do just that!

The 2015 Six Nations schedule is as follows:

Round 1:
  • Wales vs. England; Millennium Stadium, Cardiff; 20:05 hrs on 6th February.
  • Italy vs. Ireland; Stadio Olimpico, Rome; 15:30 hrs on 7th February.
  • France vs. Scotland; Stade de France, Paris; 18:00 hrs on 7th February.
Round 2:
  • England vs. Italy; Twickenham Stadium, London; 14:30 hrs on 14th February.
  • Ireland vs. France; Aviva Stadium, Dublin; 17:00 hrs on 14th February.
  • Scotland vs Wales; Murrayfield Stadium, Edinburgh; 15:00 hrs on 15th February.
Round 3:
  • Scotland vs. Italy; Murrayfield Stadium, Edinburgh; 14:30 hrs on 28th February.
  • France vs. Wales; Stade de France, Paris; 18:00 hrs on 28th February.
  • Ireland vs. England; Aviva Stadium, Dublin; 15:00 hrs on 1st March.
Round 4:
  • Wales vs. Ireland; Millennium Stadium, Cardiff; 14:30 hrs on 14th March.
  • England vs. Scotland; Twickenham Stadium, London; 17:00 hrs on 14th March.
  • Italy vs. France; Stadio Olimpico, Rome; 16:00 hrs on 15th March.
Round 5:
  • Italy vs. Wales; Stadio Olimpico, Rome; 13:30 hrs on 21st March.
  • Scotland vs. Ireland; Murrayfield Stadium, Edinburgh; 14:30 hrs on 21st March.
  • England vs. France; Twickenham Stadium, London; 17:00 hrs on 21st March.
If you've found this article useful please share it with your friends and consider using our Amazon referral link for your shopping.

Capita Court Presenter Declines TV Licensing Interview

$
0
0
Capita TV Licensing

Our noble colleague TheJesusofKayaking has been out in support of innocents who don't legally need a TV licence, but get victimised by TV Licensing anyway.

One such innocent, Hannah, appeared before Burton-on-Trent Magistrates' Court earlier today. Hannah was standing trial on trumped up charges of TV Licensing search warrant obstruction.

Without going into too much detail, Hannah doesn't legally need a TV licence. That being the case, it's difficult to imagine what legitimate evidence TV Licensing could have presented in order to obtain a warrant in the first place.

TJoK will discuss the finer points of Hannah's case in a later video, so we won't pre-empt his comments now.

As many readers will know TJoK is a keen photographer and citizen journalist. Sensing an exclusive, he decided to interview the Capita Court Presenter as she emerged from the Magistrates' Court.

In goon fishing terms she was definitely well into double figures, but looking at the state of her it's hard to believe that anyone's tackle would twitch with interest. She drives a black 5-door Hyundai i30, as shown in the image below.

Capita TV Licensing

For some reason she bleated on about having fibromyalgia and a disabled parking badge. Curiously, for someone employed as a Capita Court Presenter, she also point blank denied working for Capita.

"I work. I pay my TV licence, unlike you lot", she snapped condescendingly as the camera rolled on.

By this time she was sat in the car and getting ready to drive away. She shouted through the open window that she paid for a TV licence even though she didn't watch TV. When told that she was a mug for paying for something she didn't need, she snorted back "at least I'm a decent honest mug".

She also threatened to "get" TJoK and said she would sue him if he uploaded the video to the web.

There is one thing she did manage to get correct - the bit where she said "I'm ill". 

Sick in the head, we'd say. It might be an opportune moment for her to take medical retirement.

Please be sure to download and share the video wherever you can.

TV Licensing: A Half Truth Is A Full Lie

$
0
0

Questions are again being raised about the honesty of TV Licensing during the prosecution process.

On Monday we reported the case of Hannah, who had appeared before Burton-on-Trent Magistrates' Court on charges of obstructing a TV Licensing search warrant.

Hannah, 39, was convicted of the offence and received a 12 month conditional discharge. She was also ordered to pay £200 towards TV Licensing's prosecution costs and the £15 victim surcharge.

Hannah's case was by no means as clear cut as The Burton Mail, the local newspaper, would have readers believe. The third-rate daily has taken great delight in publishing her full name and address on no less than three separate occasions, but has omitted to mention key aspects of the defence case.

In theory a search warrant should only be granted when a Justice of the Peace or District Judge is satisfied that it is both necessary and proportionate. It is only necessary if TV Licensing has been unable to obtain voluntary access to the property and there is little prospect of being able to do so in the future; it is only proportionate if TV Licensing has credible evidence that an offence (e.g. unlicensed TV reception) is being, or has been, committed at the property and immediate, unhindered access is required to secure that evidence.

TV Licensing should never have been able to obtain a warrant, because it could never have obtained credible evidence that unlicensed TV reception was, or had been, taking place at Hannah's property. That evidence cannot exist, as Hannah does not receive TV programmes and hasn't done since her last TV licence expired. That is borne out by the fact that TV Licensing's search of the property found no evidence whatsoever of unlicensed TV reception.

This latest case appears yet another example of TV Licensing playing the system in order to obtain a warrant it would not ordinarily be entitled to.

Instead of leaving Hannah's property empty-handed and reeking of incompetence, TV Licensing fell back on the consolation prize of an obstruction charge.

We reiterate our advice that in the exceptionally rare event that TV Licensing do appear with a search warrant, the occupier should allow them immediately and unhindered access. If they don't, then even if the search draws a blank there is the realistic prospect of being pursued on an obstruction charge.

For more information about TV Licensing search warrants, please see our article "TV Licensing Search Warrants: Prevention Better than Cure".

If you've found this article useful please consider liking us on Facebook, following us on Twitter or downloading our free ebook.

TV Licensing Wrongly Threatens Pensioner For Second Time

$
0
0

TV Licensing has continued to send threatening letters to a Powys pensioner, despite previously apologising for making the same mistake.

Kate Langdon-Mead, 81, from New Radnor, qualifies for a free over-75 licence, but for the second time in three years, has been subjected to TV Licensing's menacing correspondence.

Speaking to the Hereford Times, she said: "The letters were horrible. It's caused me a lot of worry and stress.

"What I'm really worried about is that people who are infirm are receiving these letters.

"It really makes you feel on edge. I know other people who wouldn't be able to cope with this."

TV Licensing sends out an average of 100,000 threatening reminder letters to unlicensed properties every working day, despite acknowledging that more than 80% of those are destined for properties with no legal requirement for a TV licence.

The letters, which are daubed in accusatory red print, threaten the recipient with a court appearance and £1,000 fine, despite the fact that TV Licensing has no evidence of wrongdoing.

Mrs Langdon-Mead was first subjected to TV Licensing harassment three years ago.

She continued: "The first time it happened, I received a bunch of flowers and an apology.

"But for it to have happened again, it's an outrage and something ought to be done about it.

"It's just unbelievable. I simply can't believe it's happened again."

TV Licensing has again apologised to Mrs Langdon-Mead for any inconvenience caused by the wrongly delivered letters.

Mrs Langdon-Mead branded TV Licensing incompetent and said she was consulting a solicitor with a view to taking legal action.

Referring to our story, which was also publicised in the national press, she said: "When I looked on the internet I found there have been a lot of cases like mine.

"TV Licensing have actually been fined over £100,000 over the last five years for cases of harassment."

Last month we reported the story of Ann Bosely, who had told TV Licensing SIX times that it was wrongly sending threatening reminder letters to her correctly licensed property.

Anyone who doesn't need a TV licence is under no legal obligation whatsoever to communicate or co-operate with TV Licensing.

Stories like this perfectly illustrate the reason why: TV Licensing's shambolic processing of information and utter incompetence.

House of Lords Rejects Decriminalisation of TV Licence Fee

$
0
0

The Freedom Association's Andrew Allison discusses the House of Lords' decision to vote against the decriminalisation of the TV licence fee.

Given the Parliamentary session is drawing to a close - and given a Conservative mandate is far from certain in the new session - it is unlikely this will receive further consideration for several years. It appears, at least in the short-term, that the BBC's gold plated income is guaranteed for a while longer.

The unelected upper chamber was considering Clause 64 of the Deregulation Bill 2014-15, which seeks to replace the current criminal penalties for TV licence evasion with civil monetary penalties instead.

Speaking out in opposition to Clause 64 were Baron Michael Grade, a former BBC Trust chairman, and Baroness Floella Benjamin, who spent her formative years presenting BBC programme Play School.

Andrew explains: "It was a tight vote, with 178 Peers voting in favour of an amendment preventing decriminalisation of non-payment until 1 April 2017. 175 Peers voted against the amendment. If you took away those who have either earned a living out of the BBC, still work for the BBC, or have a BBC pension, the vote would have gone the other way."

Read more on the Freedom Association's website.

BBC Spends £1m on First-Class Rail Fares

$
0
0

The BBC stands further accused of squandering the TV licence fee, with news that it spent £1m on first-class rail fares between 2011 and 2014.

The figures, obtained by The Sun (and reported in the Mail on Sunday), reveal that 13,000 first-class rail tickets were purchased at an average cost of £73 each.

The bill for first-class rail tickets between London and Manchester more than doubled from £71,000 in 2010/11 to £160,000 the year after the Corporation's new Salford base opened. Spending on hotels in the area rocketed from £463,000 in 2008/09 to £1.8m in 2012/13.

During its first two years at Salford, BBC bosses ran up a hotel bill of more than £3.5m, while more than £300,000 was splashed out on first-class rail tickets.

Andy Silvester, a spokesman for the TaxPayers' Alliance, told the paper: "It's time to hit the brakes on this licence fee funded gravy train.

"The £145 TV tax is a big hit for hard-working families and the corporation shouldn't waste it."

Tory MP Rob Wilson said: "Far from keeping costs down and delivering maximum value for public money, the BBC has allowed spending on first-class rail and hotels to explode.

"Thousands of people’s licence fee payments are being eaten up by luxury travel between London and Salford, and hotels every year."

The BBC refused to disclose information about another 205,000 rail tickets claimed back by staff.

TV Licence Review: Consultation Begins

$
0
0

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport today published the terms of reference for the Government's official review into the system of TV licence enforcement.

The Review, led by David Perry QC, has been established to consider whether the sanctions currently in place for those caught receiving TV programmes without a valid TV licence are appropriate and fair, and whether the current regime represents value for money for licence fee payers and taxpayers.

In 2013 in England and Wales 153,354 people were found guilty and, of these, 152,649 were fined for watching or recording live TV without a TV licence. This is not a recordable offence, so those found guilty do not receive a centrally recorded criminal record, but a record is maintained at the court.

In Scotland, the method of enforcement differs from that of England and Wales, and licence fee evasion cases can be disposed of via an out of court fine, avoiding the necessity of a court hearing. Significantly fewer cases are dealt with via the courts, and instead the majority utilise this disposal option offered by the Procurator Fiscal’s Office.

The system in Northern Ireland and the Crown Dependencies is broadly similar to that in England and Wales.

A summary of jurisdictional differences is shown in the table below:

TV licence jurisdictional differences

Today's consultation document outlines six possible options and invites public opinion on each:
  1. Do nothing: Retain the current criminal enforcement system.
  2. Reform the current system: Leave the current offence as it stands but reform the current criminal enforcement system.
  3. Out of court settlement: Retention of the criminal offence, with an option for disposal by way of an out of court settlement.
  4. Fixed monetary penalty: Retention of the criminal offence, with an option for disposal by way of a fixed monetary penalty.
  5. Civil monetary penalty: Decriminalise and enforce via a civil infraction.
  6. Civil debt: Decriminalise and enforce as a civil debt.
Following the consultation period, the views expressed in the consultation will be considered and will inform the final report to Ministers. The Review will report by the end of June 2015 and findings will be presented to Parliament and the BBC Trust.

The Government has made clear its wish to review the current system of TV licence fee enforcement.

The Deregulation Bill 2014-15, which is currently before the House of Lords, seeks to replace the current criminal sanctions with civil monetary penalties instead, thus alleviating the criminal courts of considerable trivial workload.

There is also concern that the current criminal sanctions are disproportionate, on the basis that they are not comparable to the sanctions for the non-payment of utility and service bills.

Unfortunately the Bill's progress stalled last week when the Lords voted for amendments to the TV licence clauses.

You can read the full consultation document here.

The consultation closes on 1st May 2015 and responses can be emailed to: perry.review@culture.gov.uk

BBC Spends £34m on Taxis

$
0
0
BBC Taxi

Over the last three years the BBC has spent more than £34m on taxi fares, according to figures recently obtained under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

WhatDoTheyKnow.com user Gerald Beer asked the BBC to provide a breakdown of minicab costs incurred by the staff and contributors working within each BBC Division since 2011.

Responding to Gerald's request, the BBC explained that some of the information was exempt from disclosure under the journalism get-out clause of the Freedom of Information Act.

This get-out, known as the derogation, is regularly used by the BBC to avoid responding to requests about its creative output.

However, in an uncharacteristic act of transparency, the BBC said it would disclose all of the requested information anyway, even that normally covered by the derogation.

The BBC made the following taxi payments:
  • 2011/12: £10,741,554
  • 2012/13: £11,775,985
  • 2013/14: £11,918,789
  • Total expenditure: £34,436,328
The values above represent the entire BBC taxi spend via its central booking system. That includes spending relating to the production of creative output, which would normally be exempt from disclosure.

The BBC also provided a table of information relating to the taxi bookings made by Divisions not directly involved in the production of creative output (e.g. that information normally disclosable under the Act).


Those figures reveal that more than a quarter of a million minicab bookings were made for non-creative output purposes in a three year period, representing a total cost equivalent to the residential TV licence fees paid by a town the size of Harlow.

Of the £5.3m paid in non-creative output taxi fares, a sum of £234k was completely wasted paying for waiting time and on-arrival cancellation fees.

A BBC spokesman said: "The BBC broadcasts 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and this places different kinds of demands on our shift staff and guests travelling at unsociable hours.

"The BBC is clear that public value is essential and rigorous guidelines ensure taxi travel is proportionate and appropriate. The cheapest method of travel is always encouraged, however in some case taxis journeys are necessary such as in emergencies or broadcast deadlines."

Andy Silvester, a spokesman for the TaxPayers' Alliance, recently said: "It's time to hit the brakes on this licence fee funded gravy train.

"The £145 TV tax is a big hit for hard-working families and the Corporation shouldn't waste it."

If you've found this article useful please consider liking us on Facebook, adding us to Google+, following us on Twitter or downloading our free ebook.

Edit: This article is a revised version of that we published yesterday, which required minor corrections.

TV Licence Refund: Claim Yours Today

$
0
0
TV Licence Refund


Over the last decade that number has steadily risen in line with the increasing number of properties receiving TV programmes.

A TV licence is needed for any property where equipment is installed or used to receive TV programmes at the same time as they are broadcast to the wider public. Anyone who chooses not to receive TV programmes, for whatever reason, no longer requires a TV licence and may be entitled to a refund on any licence already held.

Despite offering a range of convenient payment options, and positively encouraging payment of the £145.50 fee at every turn, the BBC's militant revenue generation arm, TV Licensing, is often much less forthcoming when it comes to the issue of refunds.

Beat TV Licensing

There are six general situations where a refund may be claimed on the TV licence of a residential property. TV Licensing will normally request documentary evidence to support any retrospective TV licence refund claim (see refund evidence table), but proof is not normally required when claiming a refund on future periods of licence validity.

No evidence is required if the licence holder dies, or if the refund claim is made within the last full calendar quarter of licence validity.

Below we provide a brief description of the refund options available:

1. TV licence no longer needed
This is by far the most common situation. For whatever reason a licence is no longer needed for the property in question. We suggest anyone choosing to cancel their TV licence reads our previous article on the subject. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar quarters of licence validity.

2.  Covered by another TV licence
This situation might arise when the licence holder moves into another property that is already covered by a valid TV licence. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar quarters of licence validity.

3. TV licence purchased in error
This situation might arise when a second licence is mistakenly purchased for a property that is already covered by a valid TV licence. It could also be that the occupier purchased a black & white licence by mistake, but then purchased a colour licence for the same property. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar months of licence validity.

4. Replacement TV licence purchased
This situation might arise when the licence holder chooses to upgrade their black & white licence to a colour licence, or downgrade their colour licence to a black & white licence. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar months of licence validity.

5. Becomes eligible for a blind concessionary TV licence
This situation might arise when the licence holder becomes eligible for, or discovers they are eligible for, a blind concessionary licence. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar months of licence validity, up to a maximum of six months.

6. Become eligible for an Over 75 TV licence
This situation might arise when the licence holder becomes eligible for, or discovers they are eligible for, an Over 75 licence. Refunds in this situation may only be paid in respect of full unused calendar months of licence validity, back until the first day of the month of the licence holder's 75th birthday.

Refunds are only issued by cheque, which is no doubt another TV Licensing ploy to deter people from the hassle of trying to claim one.

Anyone wishing to claim a TV licence refund can use the form on TV Licensing's website. Alternatively, they may wish to contact the TV Licensing customer services line (not that we recommend it).

You can read TV Licensing's full refund policy here and view the refund evidence table here.

If you've found this article useful please consider liking us on Facebook, adding us to Google+, following us on Twitter or downloading our free ebook.

TV Licensing on BBC Tees

$
0
0

Middlesbrough.

If ever there were a town with roads paved in gold, then this is definitely not it. To its credit a lot of regeneration is taking place in the centre of Middlesbrough, but with unemployment standing at almost 15% it is still a town down on its fortunes.

The Index of Multiple Deprivation - an official Government measure of social and economic hardship - lists Middlesbrough as the eighth most deprived local authority area in England.

Little wonder then that TV Licensing, like opportunistic vultures, are circling to pick over the humble morsels of a generally impoverished town.

Aiding them in that effort is PR harlot Matt Thompson, who featured on BBC Tees' Mike Parr Show this morning. Thompson, you may recall, is employed by Leeds-based PR agency Finn Communications, who are currently a year into a four year contract to dispense TV Licensing propaganda across the north of England.


In the lead up to this morning's 9 o'clock news Parr described Thompson, who despite appearances is no relation to Aviator Bob, as an "expert" on the subject of TV Licensing. With a build up like that, we were transfixed to the radio and hanging on every word.

The show led on the subject of TV Licensing, starting at about 9:05 am.

A transcript of the segment appears below:
____________________

Mike Parr (MP): We're going to start with this this morning. Have you got any questions about the TV licence? Who needs one and how it's collected? People can come up with all kinds of excuses for not buying a television licence.

If you want to talk to our man from TV Licensing, now is the time to pick up the phone and give us a call - 01642 225511.

If you want to text in your question you can - it's 81333 and start your message with the word "Tees".

[Song - The Tide is High - Blondie]

MP: Yep, so we've been doing a bit of painting since the early hours of this morning. Not painting the building - creating works of art. Some of them are Teesside-based. If you want to take a look at those then go to the BBC Tees Facebook page, or if you follow us on Twitter they're on the BBC Tees Twitter feed as well. See what you think. Members of the team have been doing these works of art - and I use the term loosely - and we'll get those judged later on today.

Now we're going to start with this. We're going to be talking about the television licence for the next half hour or so. People come up with all sorts of excuses for not buying a television licence. For example - and this is a genuine excuse given to TV Licensing - "I lost a lot of weight, so all my money went on buying new clothes". That is an example of the sort of thing people come out with.

Now the way people watch TV is changing. Some people don't watch live television and they don't watch it on a television. They might download Coronation Street onto a tablet and then watch it at a time to suit them. So do they need a television licence?

This morning Matt Thompson from TV Licensing is here to answer your questions. Matt, good morning to you.

Matt Thompson (MT): Good morning Mike. Thanks for having me.

MP: You're welcome. This isn't a phone in about how the money is spent by the way - it's specifically on the licence fee and how it is collected. So this is the number - and there are lots of questions this morning - if you've got one it's 01642 225511. You can text me - 81333 (and) start your message with the word "Tees".

Let's start with the basics then Matt. How is the licence fee set?

MT: So the Government's responsible for setting the licence fee and it currently stands at £145.50 for a colour one and £49 for a black & white licence. We still do sell (MP: Do you?!) black & white licences. They are still popular. Less so than they were, but there's still certainly demand for them.

MP: How many people have got a black & white set then?

MT: I think it's in the thousands rather than the millions, so it is reducing all the time. But there are still those who are quite content with a black & white licence.

MP: And what does that £145.50 pay for?

MT: So that £145.50 (MP: For the colour) pays ... yes, for the colour... pays for a TV licence, which means that you are legally allowed to watch live television. So you can watch live television, regardless of the device, regardless of how you receive it - whether that be cable, satellite. It means that you're in compliance with the law.

MP: But the key word is "live" then, isn't it?

MT: It is, absolutely.

MP: So it doesn't matter what you're watching live television on, if you're watching it live you need a TV licence.

MT: That's the pivotal thing really. So yes. The most important thing, it comes down to live. If you're watching live television, or recording live television, regardless of the device - whether that be on a television, whether that be on an iPad, a mobile phone, a laptop - regardless of how you receive it - whether that be cable, terrestrial, satellite - if you're watching live television, or recording live television, then you will require a licence.

MP: So what about people who will say "I never watch the BBC"?

MT: It doesn't matter. If you're watching live television - whether that be satellite, whether that be terrestrial, whether that be channels 1, 2, 3, 4 - then you do require a licence. 

It all comes down to if it's live. And that's not just a live football match. Live is described as anything that is going out at that particular time. So for example, Match of the Day, 10:30 pm, on BBC One - that's going out as live. So if you're watching that live, then you do require a licence. If you're watching it on catch-up three days later, then you don't require a licence. It all comes down to live.

MP: Right, we'll talk about that in a bit more detail a bit later on. A lot of people don't always make the connection between the television licence and BBC Tees. They don't realise that it pays for radio as well, and all the websites that the BBC produces.

MT: Absolutely, yes it's all encompassing. TV Licensing is responsible for collecting the licence fee as efficiently as possible and informing people of the need to be correctly licensed through community relations, advertising, direct mailings. But the money that we collect as efficiently as possible will then go to the BBC Trust and they decide how it's spend. So it's not us that has any say in terms of TV output - and I know you'll probably get questions that come in around that - obviously we have no influence there. We're just responsible for collecting that money as efficiently as possible and making sure, quite frankly, that people do know when they require a TV licence.

MP: So you don't work for the BBC, you work for TV Licensing?

MT: Absolutely, yes.

MP: And who are TV Licensing responsible to?

MT: So TV Licensing falls under the BBC. It's a trademark and it's a consortium of different companies tasked, employed, with collecting the licence fee and informing people of when they need a licence.

MP: Alright. Let's see what comes in on the questions then. We've got some lines free at the moment. We've got Matt Thompson here from TV Licensing. Any question at all - don't think that your question might be a daft one, because it won't be - and times are changing and all the technology is changing. So if you've got a question about who needs a television licence give us a call - 01642 225511. If you'd rather text - 81333 (and) start your message with the word "Tees".

[Traffic and Travel Report]

MP: 01642 225511. Now, a question in here from Liz - morning to you Liz - who says that she knows somebody who got caught in her village and got fined £1,000. Is that how much the fine is if you get caught without one?

MT: You can risk a prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000, absolutely. That's the message that we're very keen to get across. So if you are actively evading the licence fee then you do risk prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 and you would still need to pay for a TV licence on top of that as well.

MP: So how do you know then whether I'm watching live television with a licence or not?

MT: Okay, so there's around 25 million licences in place. The vast majority of people are correctly licensed. A small minority aren't and are actively evading - we think around 5-6% of the population, so it is a very small minority. We owe it to the honest majority to make sure that we are enforcing UK legislation, and that is that if you're watching live television, or recording live television, then you do require a TV licence.

We use a variety of different methods to monitor those people who are actively evading, so the primary tool we use is a database of 30 plus million plus addresses, which tells us at the click of a button exactly who is currently unlicensed. We would then contact them through a mixture of written communication and also perhaps pay them a visit through an enquiry officer, to determine if they do require a TV licence. 

We're very keen to work with people - not against people. That's a key thing to say. We want to help people to understand when they require a licence, which is why I do lots of these things where I come on air and talk to people and let them know exactly what the situation is.

MP: But if you're watching live telly at an unlicensed address you're going to come down on them like a ton of bricks, aren't you?

MT: If they're actively evading then yes.

MP: So do you have to catch them in the act of watching live telly at an unlicensed address?

MT: There's lots of ways that we can catch evaders. So we used detector vans...

MP: Oh, so you've still got those?

MT: We do, yes. It isn't a myth. We have a fleet of detection vans running up and down the UK. We also have enquiry officers who have handheld devices and they are no bigger than the size of a torch and again they are really effective at identifying if someone is watching live television. And it's really important to stress that it doesn't matter if that's on a TV, or if that's on a laptop, or an iPad - we can catch people watching online as well. There's no issue there.

MP: So you can sit in the van outside, or you could use one of these kind of hairdryer devices, and you could point it at a block of flats Matt, and you know whether somebody in one of those flats is watching live television?

MT: We are really, really effective at catching evaders. We catch around 1,000 evaders each and every day and successfully prosecute around 180,000 people (each year).

MP: So how do you know if I am watching BBC One on my iPad?

MT: [Haha] You see, I can't give too much information away on that, because clearly that would help those people who actively want to evade. But I would say that obviously our technology is very, very good and we use a mixture of technologies to identify exactly when somebody is watching live television who doesn't have a licence. And as I say, it doesn't matter if it's on their TV, if it's on their iPad, laptop - it really doesn't matter. We are effective at catching evaders.

MP: We're talking to Matt Thompson. You can too. Matt is from TV Licensing. We've got some lines free at the moment if you want to get through to Matt - 01642 225511. 

Of course TV Licensing just collect the money. They don't have any say in how much you have to pay - that's all down to politicians - and the whole process of how it is set is also a political issue. Members of Parliament of all parties have been discussing ideas for reform of the system. In particular the question whether failing to pay the licence fee should be a criminal offence punishable with a jail sentence.

Well our reporter Luke Walton joins us now. Morning Luke.

Luke Walton (LW): Hello Mike.

MP: So why are these questions being raised about whether non-payment of the licence fee should be decriminalised?

LW: Well Mike, one of those calling for a change in the law is Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen. He's complained that people were getting quote "a criminal record for the only crime of being poor" and the picture is Mike, is this - in 2012 164,000 people were found guilty of TV licence evasion, of which 51 went to prison.

Now critics claim that the current system is clogging up the courts. In response the BBC says actually most TV licence cases are dealt with pretty swiftly and don't take up too much time. And the Corporation also says that removing the criminal offence, which is the proposal, could actually massively increase non-payment, because people will effectively fear a civil penalty far less. The BBC go on to warn - BBC management this is - go on to warn that there could be a loss of up to £200m a year in income to the BBC resulting from decriminalisation and that could result in TV channels closing.

MP: Right. So is the criminal sanction on the licence fee likely to be withdrawn?

LW: Well it's definitely a possibility. The situation is this. There is currently an independent review underway into the issue of decriminalisation of licence fee evasion. It's expected to report to Parliament this summer, and there are indications that both the Conservatives and Labour are looking sympathetically at the idea of moving towards these civil rather than criminal penalties, although Labour is said to want any reform piloted before it is implemented. In reality Mike the crunch will come next year with the renewal of the BBC Charter, when the whole future of the licence fee will be on the table.

MP: And there is discussion about other reforms of the licence fee as well, isn't there Luke? With some wanting it abolished altogether. So what's being suggested?

LW: Well, as you say, there's an argument that the flat rate £145 licence fee is unsustainable. Some say that it doesn't take into account that households use the BBC in lots of different ways - maybe have different abilities to pay. Others say the BBC should come out of general taxation. One option mooted is for at least some of the BBC services to be paid for from advertising and there's the idea that people might want to opt in to varying menus, varying levels of services - the more you want, if you like, the more you pay.

Now all of these options are likely to be thrown into the mix when discussions start on next year's BBC Charter renewal, although I suspect really fundamental change might come, you know, some way down the track and may depend partly on technology.

Now these discussions on Charter renewal won't start until after the General Election in May and I would say that the result of that General Election could have a bearing on the outcome of that Charter renewal and the future of the licence fee.

MP: Luke, thank you very much indeed. We're talking about the television licence with TV Licensing. We're not necessarily this morning talking about how that licence fee is spent - that is a conversation for another day - but we are talking about how it is collected. So if you've got a question - 01642 225511.

[Song - Ride a White Swan - T.Rex]

MP: T.Rex and Ride a White Swan. We're taking calls for Matt Thompson from Television Licensing this morning. Before that (we were) talking to our political correspondent Luke Walton. Something you want to clear up Matt that Luke mentioned.

MT: Yes, there was just one point. There was talk of obviously prison for not having a TV licence. Just to be really, really clear - you cannot go to prison for not having a TV licence, only for not paying the court fine. So if you're found not to have a TV licence, you risk prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000. If you then don't pay that fine, then that's when you could risk a prison sentence, but you will not automatically go to prison if you do not have a TV licence.

MP: So you will go to court first, you're given the chance to pay the fine - if you don't pay the fine then you go to prison.

MT: Then you could risk a prison sentence, yes.

MP: Okay. Let's take some calls. Hello Darren, how are you?

Darren: Hello. Morning.

MP: You're through to Matt.

MT: Hi Darren.

Darren: Hi Matt. I've never heard so much rubbish in my life about your TV detection methods that you claim to have.

Your detector vans are a total myth. There's nothing in the vans. Your handheld devices that your enforcement officers carry is nothing more than a database and you don't have anything you could point at a block of flats to detect whether somebody's watching or recording live TV. That technology doesn't exist. A TV picks up a signal - it doesn't transmit anything for you to intercept. I'd just like to know what you think about that?

MT: Yeah, thanks for the question Darren. So to address your points... [sigh] right, where do I start? So in terms of our detection methods, I guess the first thing I would say is that we are very effective at catching evaders. We catch about 1,000 evaders each and every day.

Darren: Yes, but not through detector vans or handheld detector devices. They don't exist and you know that. The only way that you can catch someone is if they admit on the doorstep that they watch or record live TV, or invite you into their house. And without that knowledge from the person you can't detect anything.

MP: Okay Darren. Is he right? Is he right? Is that caller right?

MT: No. He is absolutely incorrect.

MP: So the technology does exist then?

Darren: No, it doesn't. It doesn't.

MT: Well if I can respond to you. If you give me an opportunity to respond to your question, then I'll certainly give you an opportunity to reply.

Darren: Okay.

MT: Quite simply, you are incorrect. We do have excellent detection systems. Yes, we have a database of 30m addresses which tells us, at the click of a button, who is unlicensed. Yes, detector vans do exist. Yes, they are very effective at identifying those properties where live television is being watched, but at the same time our enquiry officers also have handheld detection devices, which compliment the detection vans and again aid us when it comes to identifying if live TV is being watched illegally. And we are effective, through these different means, at catching 1,000 evaders each and every day. So yes they do work, yes they do exist. Without these methods it would be very difficult to catch people who were watching television.

Darren: Scaremongering tactics. Scaremongering tactics from Capita and the BBC. That's all that is.

MP: So Darren, where do you get your knowledge of this from?

Darren: I work in the telecommunications industry and I know that there's no such thing. I work (in the RAF?) and I know about radio frequencies and stuff and I know that a television receives a signal. It doesn't transmit anything to be intercepted. So without a television... so if a television doesn't send out a signal, how can it be detected? It's physically impossible. I've worked in this industry for years and I know the technology out there and there's nothing that a television sends out. It doesn't transmit a signal, it receives a signal. You can't intercept a signal from a satellite and work out if it's going to that individual TV. It's spread out over such a wide area, you can't pinpoint exactly where that signal is going.

MP: Well Darren, you've made your point which has been disputed by Matt as you can hear.

Darren: Yeah, it would be.

MP: But thank you for your call Darren. Dave in Saltburn says "all televisions have chips in them that people don't know about and that's how they know what you have been watching". Any truth in that?

MT: Again, I couldn't really comment on that. We don't want to give too much information around this, because clearly obviously that could help those people who are actively wanting to evade payment of the TV licence fee. But I guess, just to reassure Darren, the technology absolutely exists. The detector vans do exist and they are effective. The handheld devices do exist and they are effective. We catch 1,000 evaders each and every day. Without that technology - if it didn't work - we'd struggle to do that.

MP: This is the number if you want to join in - 01642 225511.

[News Headlines]

MP: So we're taking your questions on Television Licensing at the moment to Matt Thompson - 01642 225511. If you'd rather text in - 81333 (and) start your message with "Tees".

And the questions coming in thick and fast now. Mac Maltby. Hello Mac. Mac says can you still buy a black & white licence? Well we've answered that - yes you can. Mac goes on to say, if so how can you tell if it's a black & white telly that they're watching?

MT: Again, the technologies are in place and have been for years. We are effective at catching people regardless of whether it's a colour licence, whether it's a black & white licence. The technology is such that we do know if people are watching live television and they don't have a licence.

MP: And whether it's colour or black & white though? That's Mac's point.

MT: We can identify. We can identify exactly what's going on.

MP: Right. Mike at Ingleby Barwick says "if you have a television in your house but you don't use it or watch it, do you have to pay the television licence? If I film a wedding for example and then copy it onto a DVD disk the same day, then play it back the same day on a DVD player, not television, do I need a licence as it will be live the same day?"

MT: No. You don't need a TV licence for that. It's live television. If you're watching live television or recording live television then you do require a licence. If you're watching a DVD for example that you got from the local shop, then you don't require a licence. If you only ever watch catch-up television - regardless of the device - if you only ever watch catch-up television then you don't require a TV licence, but we know that's around 2% of the population. So a very small minority of the population only ever watch catch-up television.

MP: Dave in the Boro' says "do you legally have to pay the television licence if you've withdrawn the right of access? I was sick of the aggressive nature of people knocking on doors, so I've withdrawn the right of access to Television Licensing."

MT: It's UK law, so yes you do legally have to have a TV licence if you're watching or recording live television.

MP: Alright. Email from Sue - hello Sue - she says that she has a friend who says that she doesn't need a TV licence even though she has one. She doesn't watch it and uses her laptop instead.

MT: Again, it comes down to live. So, thanks for the question Sue. Essentially if your friend is watching live television - so television as it is transmitted, regardless of the device - so if she's watching it on her laptop then she still would require a TV licence.

MP: Let's talk about free and discounted licences then. Who is entitled to a free television licence?

MT: So if you are over 75 the good news is that you're entitled to a free TV licence, but you need to let us know and we would ask that people do get in contact with us. There's lot of ways you can do this - you can go through the website, tvlicensing.co.uk, or you can give us a call on 0300 790 6112. 

And if you're just about to turn 75, but a little bit off, so maybe 74, you can apply for a short-term licence. But again, let us know. We need to know, so we would ask that people get in contact either through the website or by picking up the phone. Let us know. We can arrange that short-term licence just to carry you over until you reach 75 and then you are eligible for a free licence, but you have to get in contact with us to let us know that you are 75.

MP: What happens if you move house then?

MT: Again, we would just ask that people get in touch with us to let us know. So, you can do that via the website, you can actually put in that you've moved address and identify your new address, absolutely fine. Or again, pick up the phone to us and let us know that you've moved address. It is no issue at all, but we just need to know.

MP: So can you transfer your TV licence to your new address, or do you have to effectively start again?

MT: No, you can transfer it to the new address, but you just need to let us know. We just need to know that you've moved to a different address, know that address and that's no problem.

MP: Is there such a thing as a discounted television licence? People who pay a reduced rate?

MT: Yep, so those people who are blind or severely sight impaired are eligible for a 50% concession to their television licence. And also those people who are living in sheltered accommodation, again they may be eligible for a TV licence for just £7.50. But again we would urge them to get in touch - tvlicensing.co.uk or give us a call on 0300 790 6112 - we can get to know their situation and identify if they are eligible for that concession.

MP: So what happens if you've got a caravan? You know, it's a nice weekend and you've got one of those televisions with a portable aerial - do you need a separate licence for your caravan?

MT: So no licence is required for a touring caravan, a vehicle or boat, as long as a valid licence is held for the home address by the main driver or occupant.

MP: So your home licence applies to your caravan.

MT: It does, yes.

MP: What if you've got a hotel? What if you've got a hotel with 300 rooms? How many licences do you need then?

MT: So for hotels and holiday accommodation, they can apply for a hotel and mobile unit licence. This means they buy one licence for the first 15 units of accommodation, then a further licence for every addition 5 units.

MP: Right. So for every 15 rooms in a hotel you would need one licence.

MT: For the first 15 rooms you need one licence, then for every additional 5 you need one further licence.

MP: Just taken a call from a fellow listening to our conversation on the phone earlier. He says that his Dad used to work on the detector vans and the doubters should be in no doubt at all that the technology definitely does exist.

MT: Yes, it's reassuring to hear that from a listener. It does. It absolutely does exist. We have these different detection methods. They're working very, very well. The vast majority of people are correctly licensed. Evasion stands very low at around 5-6%. We are effective at catching evaders, but at the same time let me be really, really clear - we want to work with people. We want to make sure that people are correctly licensed. We don't want to prosecute people for not having a licence. We'd much rather they willingly obliged and complied with the law, but where we have to then we will effectively prosecute evaders.

MP: We're talking to Matt Thompson from TV Licensing this morning. If something has occurred to you - a question that we haven't answered yet, something quite personal to you - there's still time to give us a call and we'll get you on - 01642 225511.

It's not about how we spend the money this morning, it's how it's collected. And in the UK we pay £145.50 every year for the television licence. It is a legal requirement. So how do other countries do it? Tim Wescott is from industry analysts IHS Technologies. Tim, good morning to you.

Hello Tim, can you hear me okay? We've got a problem with Tim. We'll try to get Tim on the line in just a moment. Hello Tim. Can you hear me Tim?

Tim Wescott (TW): Yes, I can hear you. Can you hear me?

MP: Yeah, got you now. That's loud and clear. How do other countries then do it?

TW: How do other countries collect the licence fee? Or how do they...

MP: Yes, how do they collect it?

TW: I'm not an expert on collection, but most countries in the world don't actually have a TV licence. We're aware of about 21 countries that currently have a TV licence. Most countries finance public broadcasting by direct tax, so it's a sum that is actually levied in tax every year and set by parliament.

MP: I gather Serbia and Romania pay through their electricity bill. Is that true?

TW: Yes, some countries do that. That's the case in Greece as well. There's basically a supplement that you pay in addition to your electricity bill. I'm told that you pay that whether you have a TV set or not, so there are even places like cemeteries - which are on record in Greece my Greek colleagues tell me - which have to pay a fee for TV.

MP: Yeah, but most European countries have some form of TV licence?

TW: There are some which... I mean the Scandinavian countries have a quite similar system to the UK. In Norway, Denmark and Sweden there's no advertising on public service and there's a licence fee. It's the same in Japan - there's also a licence fee there. A lot of countries have a mixed system, so the public TV actually has advertising and commercials and sponsorship as well as a licence fee and then they also supplement that by a top up with taxation.

MP: Now I notice in Poland they have a relatively low TV licence, 55 Euros, but they've got a very high evasion rate of 65%.

TW: Yeah, ironically. I can't really explain the economics of that, but Poland has a real problem with collecting the licence fee, so they are thinking of bringing in other systems to finance public TV.

MP: Now in Finland, and Iceland I think, they've abolished their TV licence and replaced it with a tax that applies to all adults. Now is that popular?

TW: I can't speak for whether it's popular. I think in Finland, which was the country which abolished the licence most recently - I think it was about two years ago - they brought something in which is called a public broadcasting tax. That means that what you pay for the public broadcaster, which is called YLE, is based on your income. So there's a maximum you pay - you pay up to 140 Euros a year and it's based on 0.6% of your income, so if your income is below a certain level you don't pay anything for public broadcasting.

MP: And the way that we go about it in this country then with the TV detector vans, which Matt has told us about. They know which addresses are unlicensed, then they go to take a look at whether you're watching live television at that address. Do you think that will have to change? Will technology become available in some way that we can get rid of the TV detector vans?

TW: I lived in France briefly and I went to buy a TV set and a few days later I got a demand for the French TV licence, so I think there are other ways of establishing whether you have a TV set. Obviously people are using lots of other devices now like smart phones, games consoles to watch TV. I believe - I'm not a technologist - but I believe there are ways of tracking when people are online and what they are actually streaming online. So I think there will be other ways of actually monitoring whether people are watching live broadcasts by whatever device.

MP: Tim, thank you very much indeed for that. Just a taste of what other countries do around the world with their television licence.

You were nodding there when we were talking about technology changing, because it's a bit old fashioned isn't it? Sort of this hit and miss idea of trying to catch people in the act.

MT: Yeah, it was interesting to hear what the gentleman there was saying. I think just to reinforce that it really doesn't matter what technology you're using to watch live television. We have technology in place that is really very good and have had this technology in place for some time. And it's just as capable at identifying if you're watching live television from a traditional television as it is from an iPad or a laptop.

MP: But it's going to become more difficult, surely isn't it? People are watching live television on the go now. My mobile phone there. I can watch certain stuff live on my mobile phone. How are you going to make sure that I've got a television licence? I'm assuming my home television licence then, covers me watching live television now on my mobile phone?

MT: It does, yes - as long as it's not plugged in. If you were to plug it in here, then this site would require a licence for you to watch live television. But absolutely, you would be covered by your home (TV licence) to watch live television on your mobile phone.

MP: In the same way as my caravan would be?

MT: Yes, absolutely. Yeah, as you're out and about there.

MP: Alright, we've got some questions coming in. Are you okay to hang on for a bit longer?

MT: Absolutely no problem at all, yes.

[Traffic Report]

MP: So Matt Thompson is here from TV Licensing. Let's do some more questions - there's quite a few coming in now. David in Norton says "I pay my television licence quarterly. Can I ask if I pay more, because of the way I choose to pay?"

MT: Is that... So I would need to know... Quarterly Direct Debit? There is a slight premium attached to quarterly Direct Debit, which I think is around £1.25. That comes from the UK Government. That doesn't come from TV Licensing. We're merely complying with what is set by UK Government. But we do say to people - we do obviously inform them of that premium before they actually pay - but there's lots and lots of different ways that you can pay for your licence.

You can do it by Direct Debit, but you can also pay by credit or debit card in one sweep, you can pay by cheque, you can use a payment card. So there's lots and lots of different ways to pay. You can do it in monthly installments, in quarterly installments, you can do it in one big lump sum. So again, we try to work with people, because we do recognise that different payment methods suit different people. So that's why there's such a wide breadth and depth, so that hopefully there's something for everyone.

MP: Terry in Billingham says "contrary to what that earlier caller says" - that was Darren, controversial Darren - "receivers do leak a small transmitter signal. That leak is what gets detected. Am I right?" says Terry.

MT: I wouldn't want to go into too much detail...

MP: I thought you wouldn't!

MT: ... as to exactly as to how we do go about it. Clearly if I did, that information might be useful for those people who are actively evading. But I would say, look, the proof is in the pudding. You heard my argument back to Darren earlier. The proof is in the pudding. We are very, very effective at catching evaders. We catch around 1,000 each and every day.

MP: Joe. Thanks for your question. He says "when a person dies and they are over the age of 75, what happens then to the person who's left in the house who might be under the age of 75?"

MT: Okay, so we would ask them to get in contact with us. And if that person is under the age of 75 then they would require... be required to pay for a licence.

MP: Ah, anonymous texter says "I used to work in the garage that repairs the vehicles - the TV detector vans - and I can tell you for a fact the technology does exist. These people doubting it should be in no doubt, and that has been the case since 1980."

Mike in Marton says "my husband died on 1st October. He was 93 and I am 89. My daughter has told me that I don't need to re-register. Is true?"

MT: What I would say is that it depends whose name the licence was in. So if it was in her deceased husband's name then she can just let us know.

MP: It was in his name apparently.

MT: Yeah. If she can just let us know and obviously we can put it in her name. No issue at all. She's still eligible for a free licence, clearly, but it's just so we have a record of it in the right name. And again, you can either go through the website or, if it's easier, just give us a call on 0300 790 6112.

MP: Alright. Next one says "I'm over 75 and I've got a guest suite" - very nice too - "if the guests comes and then watch television in the guest suite, do we have to pay?"

MT: So, would I be interpreting that correctly when I say that's a hotel... holiday, hotel accommodation? Because if it is hotel accommodation...

MP: It's just in an apartment. It's just a flat, but there's a sort of guest...

MT: Sort of spare room?

MP: I guess that's what it must be, yeah.

MT: If it's a spare room then that's fine. Absolutely fine.

MP: So that's covered by your licence for that property?

MT: If you've got a 3-bedroom property and you have your friends over, then your licence will cover you for that property.

MP: John in Acklam says "what happens if I go away on holiday and you leave your house empty with a TV there, but not in use? Do you have to pay the licence?"

MT: Well if you're not watching live television then you don't require a licence. But it doesn't cover you just for your holiday period so obviously if you then return...

MP: He's maybe wanting a rebate then, say he goes away for a month? I mean that's a fair point I suppose, isn't it? If you go away for a long time, can you claim a rebate for that time?

MT: So if you are away for a long time... so certainly from a student perspective, for example, where we see this quite often. Students may get a licence at the beginning of term time - around September or October - but then may go home at around June time, so they've still got at least 3 months left on their licence. In that case they are absolutely eligible for a refund for a full quarter, but they just need to get in touch and we will refund them, yes. So it has to be more then 3 months, but certainly if somebody is away for a long time, do get in contact and we'll work with you to identify just when you need a licence, but also how much you should be paying.

MP: Liz says "is this not an invasion of people's privacy - detecting things in people's houses?"

MT: It's UK law to have a TV licence. The vast majority of people - 95% of people - are correctly licensed. There's just a very small minority - around 5% - who aren't. We owe it to the honest majority to ensure that we are enforcing the law.

MP: So what sort of excuses do people come up with then?

MT: We've had some very... sometimes ridiculous, sometimes sublime - some examples I've got here. So we had one excuse: "I have only just passed my driving test. I haven't done a test for my TV licence yet". Another excuse we had was: "Ghosts turn over my TV channels all the time, so I haven't bothered to renew my TV licence. Why would I, when I can't watch what I want?" We've also had another animal related excuse: "The TV belongs to my dog. He got it for Christmas. Ask him to pay." And one final excuse we had: "My son lost my tooth and the next day we found the TV under the stairs. We thought it was a present from the tooth fairy, so didn't need a TV licence."

MP: These are all real?

MT: These, incredibly, are all real excuses that have been given to our enquiry officers across the UK.

MP: And I can probably guess what the reaction was then from your (red?)

How much... erm, you know, you're collecting this then... so we know that for a colour licence it's £145.50. How much of that goes on admin then? The cost of what you do?

MT: So we're getting increasingly efficient at collecting the licence fee. Clearly it's a massive job, but last year alone we reduced the cost of collection by £9m to an all time low.

MP: So how did you do that?

MT: We're constantly working to reduce the cost of collection. One thing that has been a great way of reducing the cost of collection has been our TV Licensing website, which essentially enables you to identify if you need a licence, you can purchase your licence, you can tell us if you don't need a licence as well. So, as you can imagine, that's led to huge efficiencies. But we're always looking for ways to reduce the cost of collection. But as I say, we are doing it more efficiently than ever before. Over the past year we collected £3.7bn in revenue, which was a £16.4m increase on the previous year.

MP: And final question, I think. When a conviction goes to court do you use evidence then from the detector vans to secure the conviction?

MT: We use evidence that we've amassed using all the different technologies, yes.

MP: Matt, I think that's just about it. Ah, a caller says "no conviction has ever produced actual evidence from a van".

MT: I would say that clearly we use these technologies for a reason, so we have very clear information that would lead us to prosecute somebody.

MP: Matt, thanks very much indeed. Thanks for taking the calls and answering the questions this morning. Matt Thompson from Television Licensing.
____________________

And so it went on... and on... and on...

A whole of hour of BBC Tees promoting the BBC TV licence fee, with Thompson using every utterance to reinforce the "effectiveness" of TV Licensing's technology.

I have never endured such a protracted and stomach-churningly biased piece of BBC reporting on the subject of the TV licence fee. It's as if the entire schedule was swept aside for Thompson to boast about the effectiveness of TV Licensing's regime.

I can't type any more!

TV Licensing on BBC Tees: The Truth About Detection

$
0
0

PR flunky Matt Thompson was entertaining the radio listeners of Teesside yesterday when BBC Tees granted him a whole hour of air time to promote the BBC TV licence.

Radio host Mike Parr, who had clearly planned yesterday's show on the back of a fag packet, listened intently as the gappy-toothed PR man spun a single message - whatever you're watching, however you're watching it, you need a TV licence - into as many permutations as possible.

Indeed Thompson's message was so repetitive that listeners can't be sure that Parr wasn't simply pushing a button to play preselected TV Licensing soundbites.

To give Thompson some credit his words were generally accurate up until the point that caller Darren arrived on the scene. Having listened to many TV Licensing PR harlots over the years, it is fair to say that Thompson is a skilled orator. Well rehearsed in TV Licensing's mantra, he is seemingly able to twist most stories in their favour. He does that without the merest wobble in tone or flicker of conscience.


Darren, who had some comments about TV Licensing's enforcement activities, clearly threw a spanner in the works. Thompson's frustration was audible as Darren, who claimed to work in the telecommunications industry, rejected outright the concept of TV detection. He also said that far from being the magical detectors TV Licensing want people to believe, goon handheld devices are actually for accessing the LASSy database.

Darren astutely continued: "The only way that you can catch someone is if they admit on the doorstep that they watch or record live TV, or invite you into their house. And without that knowledge from the person you can't detect anything."

Giving the audible gasps and sighs in the background, Thompson was clearly rattled by the message Darren was sharing with his fellow BBC Tees listeners. Excuses were made and Darren was quickly bundled off the air, but the damage was already done.


In the remainder of this post we shall consider some of the issues raised on the programme in more detail.

Detection
Unlike some of our fellow commentators, the TV Licensing Blog believes that television detection is a reality. TV Licensing works hard to maintain the facade that detector vans are busily rumbling up and down streets in every town, every day.

The reality is very different to that, with detector vans few and far between. The use of detection is strictly controlled by legislation and, due to the various legal hoops that need to be jumped through, is not nearly as widespread or effective as the BBC would like people to think.

The BBC has previously admitted that it relies on the public's perception that detection can be used to catch licence fee evaders at any time. The BBC is concerned that if the true extent of detection was made public, it would reduce the deterrence effect of detector vans and make people more likely to evade the licence fee.

The BBC has previously told us that detection evidence has never been presented during the prosecution of an alleged licence fee evader. The BBC realises that it would be suicide to present detection evidence in open court, because doing so would render that evidence open to closer public and scientific scrutiny. If presented with the opportunity, there is the real possibility that the defence would be able to pick holes in the manner in which detection evidence was obtained.

It will only take one expert witness to say "actually, this evidence is riddled with scientific errors" and the illusion of effective detection will be shattered for good. The BBC wants to avoid that at all costs, as it has spent years developing the public perception we mentioned earlier. For that reason TV Licensing collects detection evidence for the sole purpose of obtaining search warrants. The warrant application process, for obvious reasons, takes place behind closed doors, so the only people that will ever hear TV Licensing's detection evidence are the Magistrates considering the application.

Evidence uncovered during the subsequent execution of these warrants would then form the basis of any prosecution. Within the past few months the BBC has reiterated that detection evidence has never been presented in court.


Any activity that involves snooping on private individuals is strictly governed by legislation called the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. Television detection is no exception and further legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (BBC) Order 2001, dictates exactly how and when that technology can be used.

Capita, the TV Licensing operations contractor, is responsible for the operation of detection equipment. The equipment itself is designed and manufactured by the BBC's in-house research and development team. Detector vans, which are currently plain white high-topped VW Transporters, are kitted out by Ely based DB Broadcast Ltd, which also performs maintenance at regular intervals. Most of the current vans, an example of which can be viewed here, were first registered in 2009-10.

The 2001 Order states that each use of detection can only be authorised by a senior manager within the BBC's TV Licensing Management Team. It goes on to identify three post holders who can act as Authorising Officer - the Head of Sales, the Head of Marketing and the Head of Revenue Management. Up until very recently the Head of Sales & Marketing was a combined job, which meant there were only two Authorising Officers able to sign off detection applications for the whole of the UK.

There are two types of detection available for use:
  • Specific detection: This is where detection equipment is aimed at a single identified property.
  • General detection: This is where detection equipment is aimed at more than one identified property that in the same vicinity to each other.
Note that detection can only be used against targeted addresses, where evasion is suspected and when normal enquiries (e.g. letters and door knockers) have drawn a blank. The legislation does not allow TV Licensing to drive along on a fishing expedition in the hope of detecting evaders at random.


If Capita wishes to use detection then it has to submit a written application to one of the BBC Authorising Officers, who are duty bound to consider it carefully. Detection should only be authorised if the circumstances fully justify it. Detection should not be authorised when there is a risk it will encroach on the privacy of a neighbouring property. A single detection authorisation lasts for a period of 8 weeks, but has to be reviewed at the half way point.  Detection may be attempted on multiple occasions during the validity period of an authorisation.

The BBC is required to maintain an accurate record of all detection authorisations. The Office of Surveillance Commissioners (OSC) - the regulator overseeing compliance with the legislation - inspects the BBC's detection systems on a three year rolling cycle. Previous inspection reports have complimented the BBC on the thoroughness and accuracy of its record keeping. Reassuringly, the OSC has also commented on evidence that the BBC rejects authorisation requests when application paperwork fails to pass muster.

In conclusion, the use of detection is not nearly as widespread as Thompson and his ilk would have people believe.


Online and mobile TV reception
On several occasions during yesterday's show, Thompson claimed that TV Licensing's technology was able to detect viewers by whatever means they were watching, be that on a normal TV set, laptop, tablet or mobile phone. For the sake of brevity, I shall refer to these as portable devices.

Whilst it may be true that TV Licensing can, on occasion, catch evaders watching on portable devices, it is not true that their technology allows them to do that.

The only way that TV Licensing can catch an evader on a portable device is if that person admits to receiving TV programmes without a licence or, in exceptionally rare circumstances, they are caught in the act of receiving TV programmes without a licence.

TV Licensing does not have a magic wand that allows it to see what people are watching online, nor does it have a magic wand that can hack into a person's mobile phone signal. Of course TV Licensing want people to believe that that technology does exist, which is why they employ people like Thompson to spread that disinformation.


As Darren correctly said: "The only way that (TV Licensing) can catch someone is if they admit on the doorstep that they watch or record live TV, or invite you into their house."

Black & white TV reception
Thompson claimed that TV Licensing's technology was such that it was able to distinguish between people receiving TV programmes on colour equipment and those receiving TV programmes on black & white equipment.

Thompson is wrong. TV Licensing does not have any technology that allows it to do that. The only way TV Licensing can verify black & white TV reception is by conducting a "mono challenge" visit to the property in question. TV Licensing routinely visits properties covered by a black & white licence for that very reason - they have no other way of checking.

It's time to make a collective stand against TV Licensing threats, harassment and disinformation.


If you've found this article useful please consider liking us on Facebook, adding us to Google+, following us on Twitter or downloading our free ebook.

TV Licensing Dodgy Deposition Case: An Update

$
0
0
We have been following the story of how YouTube user j2Lightworker, real name (Jonathan) James Fallows, has been trying to hold TV Licensing to account after it wrongly searched his former property.

Anyone unfamiliar with James' case will find detailed background information in our earlier post on the subject. 

As someone who never watches TV programmes, James was flabbergasted at becoming the victim of a TV Licensing search warrant visit. 

That visit, which took place towards the end of June 2012, found no evidence whatsoever of unlicensed TV reception - then again it wouldn't do, given the legitimacy of James' licence free status.

Given that James' innocence had been confirmed, he was curious at the evidence TV Licensing presented to Magistrates in order to obtain the search warrant in the first place. Before proceeding, anyone unfamiliar with the search warrant process might like to read our detailed post on the subject.

To put not too fine a point on it, it would appear that the evidence presented by TV Licensing was flawed. That evidence, which was presented on oath, can be viewed in full in our earlier post. It is directly contradicted by video footage James obtained of TV Licensing visits prior to the warrant's execution.

Even giving TV Licensing the benefit of the doubt, it would appear that questions remain about the quality of evidence it presented during the search warrant application. Quite simply, TV Licensing's account and that shown in James' video do not match. One of them must be wrong and the source of that error, which has resulted in an innocent man's home being violated, is surely worthy of closer investigation.

James' initial approach was to raise his concerns with Kirklees Magistrates' Court, which had authorised the search of his former property in the first place. Contrary to expectation, the court wasn't the least bit concerned at the idea that TV Licensing may have laid inaccurate information on oath. The court did, however, suggest that the police may be more interested in hearing James' concerns.

That being the case James took his complaint to Bradford Central Police Station. Having laboriously explained the situation to the civilian desk officer, he was eventually rewarded by the presence of a real police officer. That officer, Inspector David Apsee, flippantly rejected James' concerns and refused to take his complaint. 

Trade unionist Apsee, who clearly believes that TV Licensing is above the law, has since been disciplined for the unprofessional way he dealt with James on that occasion. Despite acknowledging its poor handling of James' complaint, West Yorkshire Police has been loathe to investigate matters any further.

That brings us about up to date, but this matter is not going away. James and his supporters are still actively pursuing an investigation into the evidence presented by TV Licensing. Letters, emails and a dossier of evidence are flying all over the place, so it will surely only be a matter of time before James' concerns are taken seriously.

It is a matter of grave concern that the police and courts, who should be working to uphold the law, have closed ranks to make James' quest for answers as difficult as possible.

Watch this space for further updates.

BBC Told to Cut Waste or Lose TV Licence Fee

$
0
0

The BBC has been given an ultimatum by MPs: deliver better value or risk losing the TV licence fee.

Today's Sunday Express exclusive follows the damning revelation that the BBC spent more than £34m of licence fee payers' money on taxis over the past three years.

Conor Burns, Tory MP for Bournemouth West and member of the influential House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, is quoted as saying that the BBC "has failed in its duty to ensure the licence fee is well spent".

In a letter to Culture Secretary Sajid Javid, Mr Burns added: "I trust that as the process of Charter Review moves forward you will put transparency alongside excellence in programming at the very core of our expectations of the BBC."

The Committee is due to publish a long awaited report, which will make recommendations about the terms of the BBC's Charter renewal in 2016.


Under current arrangements the BBC is funded by the £145.50 TV licence fee. In 2013-14 the BBC, which is legally responsible for the administration and enforcement of the TV licence, collected £3.7bn of licence fee revenue.

Mr Burns' letter continued: "I was encouraged when, in 2010, the BBC Trust agreed that the National Audit Office, which checks the accounts of all government departments, public agencies and a number of other organisations, would have full access to the BBC’s accounts to ensure that it is providing value for money.

"However, the head of the NAO, Sir Amyas Morse, recently reported to Parliament that the BBC often refuses to provide or delays the provision of evidence that would allow the NAO to assess its spending on behalf of taxpayers.

"I find this unacceptable and I know from my constituents that it damages the level of trust that we, the public, have in the corporation."


According to the Sunday Express article, several high profile Tory MPs are aligning their position with that of Mr Burns.

One such MP, Philip Davies, who represents the good people of Shipley and also sits on the Culture Select Committee, said: "If the BBC wants to have the benefits of guaranteed licence fee income every year then that must come with total transparency as to how the money is spent. If they don’t want transparency then they must abandon the licence fee and earn their own money. They can’t have it both ways."

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said he would like to see the BBC adopt the same level of transparency as Whitehall departments and town halls.

According to Mr Pickles: "It will help keep costs down and protect the public's money. Such spending discipline will also ensure more money can be diverted to home-grown programming, supporting high-quality journalism not spendthrift executive management. The BBC top brass seem very shy about this. What have they got to hide?"


Andrew Allison, of the Freedom Association’s Axe The Tax campaign, said: "As the BBC is funded by a tax on all households who watch television, it should be open and transparent with the public on how it spends its income.

"If it doesn’t want that level of public scrutiny, then it should get its income through subscription or advertising, like every other broadcaster."

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee's report on the future of the BBC is due for release on Thursday. It is expected to recommend the abolition of the BBC Trust.

TV Licensing Goon Knocks on Wrong Door

$
0
0

A TV Licensing goon bore the brunt of an unexpectedly hostile reception when he recently visited a Sheffield property.

Details are still patchy on this one and we cannot be sure of the exact date or location of the incident. Video footage reveals in colourful detail how the TV Licensing goon faced a torrent of abuse from the clearly disgruntled occupier of the property he was visiting.

The video, which can be viewed here (although probably not for long), begins with the occupier emerging from a car parked on the driveway. Catapulting himself from the driving seat, the occupier demanded the goon's ID card and squared up to him.

He accused the goon of bullying his partner and children and made it quite clear that he would not be funding BBC corruption and paedophilia. In the moments that followed the occupier was seen shouting the goon off his property and threatening to "knock the fucking shit" out of him. "Do you think I give a shit about a few more days jail?" added the occupier. 

The goon sheepishly retreated to the street with the occupier in hot pursuit. Eventually the goon, who was wearing a black Karrimor hooded jacket, arrived back at his vehicle. The blue Fiat Bravo, registration number SM08 XJK, was parked about 100 yards further up the road.

For added effect, a police car could be seen parked on the opposite side of the road as the occupier's relentless stream of insults continued to flow.

It really was quite a confrontation. Much as we share the occupier's disapproval of TV Licensing, we are concerned that his behaviour crossed the line. He was overly threatening, aggressive and confrontational and will undoubtedly be receiving a visit from the police.

TV Licensing, just like their BBC bosses, are very happy to threaten innocent people in their homes, but as soon as the boot is on the other foot they scream louder than a teenager pinned in the corner of Jimmy Savile's dressing room.

We actively encourage the filming of TV Licensing goon visits, but reiterate our stance that it must be done in a passive manner and from a safe distance.

Such hostility - even to a low-life TV Licensing goon - cannot be condoned.

Scottish TV Licensing Goon Roger Caught on Camera

$
0
0

A Scottish TV Licensing goon has been caught on camera peddling his immoral wares for the second time.

The goon in this case, who goes by the name of Roger, appears to be visiting the property to confirm a No Licence Needed declaration by the occupier.

Poor old Roger was looking a bit bedraggled in this latest video, as he trudged around in the rain desperately trying to fulfill his hourly quota for completed Code 8 prosecution statements.

We don't approve of Roger's manner in this latest video. Not only does he poke fun at the occupier exercising his legal right to film, but he also outstays his welcome.

The occupier makes it clear that TV Licensing is not welcome, but instead of turning on his heels the bearded buffoon decides to argue the toss over the legalities of trespass in Scotland. We'd suggest that Roger's attitude is not endearing to the TV Licensing cause.

As it goes, Roger is wrong - it is still possible to trespass on private residential property in Scotland. Even if it wasn't, the TV Licensing Visiting Procedures and Withdrawal of Implied Rights of Access (WOIRA) Policy makes it quite clear that goons should always leave when they are told to.

Below, for educational purposes, we have transcribed the short encounter between goon and occupier:
____________________
Occupier: Who are you? What do you want?

Goon: Are you filming me?

Occupier: Definitely. Always.

Goon: You're very mature.

Occupier: I am very mature.

Goon: So you've told us that you don't have a television? That you don't watch live television?

Occupier: Ah ha. I've also told you that I've removed any presumed consent for coming on this property.

Goon: Well that's not so, because I'm able to tell you that that's not actually...

Occupier: It doesn't matter. But anyway, I don't want you on my property.

Goon: That's not actually legally applicable in Scotland, it's an English thing.

Occupier: I don't care. I really just don't want you on my property.

Goon: Okay.

Occupier: No offence to yourself. We've all got a job to do, but I'm not entertaining this conversation.

Goon: Do you have a television?

Occupier: I'm not entertaining this conversation. Thanks for your time.
____________________
Interesting from our point of view is the fact that when Roger shows his ID card it displays his name as just that - Roger.

It is the second time (read about the first case) we have seen a TV Licensing ID card bearing only the goon's forename. On that basis, we would suggest that Capita has adopted a new style of ID card. It would appear they are wising up to the fact that goons are becoming the target of public ridicule when their ID cards are filmed and their full names are uploaded to the web.

What a bunch of spoilsports!
Viewing all 1019 articles
Browse latest View live